Huntington West Virginia News Messge Boards

The Huntington West Virginia News Message Boards contain political opinions and Political commentary about Huntington West Virginia Local News and local West Virginia politics. This is a local political forum for Huntington West Virginia.

 

Huntington West Virginia News Messge Boards Forum Index

West Virginia Website Hosting


REAL ID

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Huntington West Virginia News Messge Boards Forum Index ->Huntington WV News Discussion
Author Message
indago
Guest





PostPosted: Thu May 05, 2005 2:08 pm    Post subject: REAL ID Reply with quote

It used to be: "Show me your drivers license, registration, and proof of insurance." Now, it's: " Show me your drivers license, registration, proof of insurance, and Social Security Number." From the New York Times: " Congress is still a few days away from establishing sweeping federal requirements for a driver's license, including proof that an applicant's presence in the United States is legal. But as Jorge Medina-Gonzalez discovered late last year driving from a Home Depot with a can of paint, the rules of the road in places like Nutley, N.J., have already changed.

Mr. Medina, 42, was close to home when two Nutley police officers stopped his Jeep Cherokee because of a broken taillight. They asked for his license and registration, then his Social Security number. In the few minutes it took them to search a national database in a curbside version of the kind of checks that Congress is about to require nationwide, the American life Mr. Medina had built over 13 years began to crumble."

Mr. Medina is an illegal alien. " His driver's license became a one-way ticket to immigration jail, where he remains."

SHOW ME YOUR PAPERS...
Back to top
indago
Guest





PostPosted: Mon May 16, 2005 8:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

And add to that a DNA profile and government has just about all the information that could be desired, along with cellphone GPS tracking; history profile; and etc.
Back to top
Guest






PostPosted: Mon May 16, 2005 9:26 am    Post subject: In the meantime it would protect our jobs from ILLEGALS. Reply with quote

indago wrote:
And add to that a DNA profile and government has just about all the information that could be desired, along with cellphone GPS tracking; history profile; and etc.


So that would make 9-11 terror attacks very difficult.

When we defeat the moslems terrorists, we can lighten up.

In the meantime it would protect our jobs from ILLEGALS.
Back to top
Steph
Guest





PostPosted: Tue May 17, 2005 6:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

If we are so afraid that we give up our liberty for security, we deserve niether. I believe FDR was correct " We have nothing to fear but fear itself".
Back to top
indago
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Sep 22, 2006 10:09 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Driver license security may cost billions

Friday, September 22, 2006

The Associated Press

COLUMBUS, Ohio - New federal security rules for issuing driver licenses could cost $11 billion to implement, raising concerns among states about paying for the changes, according to a national survey of states released Thursday.

"There's no question that state legislators believe driver licenses should be as secure as is possible," said William Pound, executive director of the National Conference of State Legislatures which helped conduct the survey. "The $11 billion question is, `Who's going to pay for it?'"

The requirements - which are not final - are part of the Real ID Act of 2005, which grew out of a recommendation by the Sept. 11 commission. The law requires states to incorporate common security features to prevent tampering or counterfeiting, such as using standard materials in every state to print the cards.

Without such features on their licenses, people would not be allowed to board an airplane or enter a federal building.

Seven of the Sept. 11, 2001, hijackers exploited a loophole that allowed people to obtain driver licenses and ID cards by submitting sworn statements instead of proof of residency or identity. The biggest cost, about $8.5 billion, would come in re-enrolling the 245 million people who already have driver licenses and identification cards, the survey found.

© 2006 The Birmingham News
Back to top
indago
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 4:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

CNN -- LOU DOBBS TONIGHT -- Aired February 26, 2007 - 18:00 ET

Many states are still unhappy over mandatory federal standards for issuing driver's licenses. The Department of Homeland Security is expected to issue new guidelines this week, and states have just over a year to put them in place.

Now, Jeanne Meserve tells us why states are putting up resistance to the law.

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: I definitely don't think this is going to work.

JEANNE MESERVE, CNN HOMELAND SECURITY CORRESPONDENT (voice over): But it does. The prankster goes into the Virginia Department of Motor Vehicles and comes out with a valid driver's license, silly picture and all.

From a security perspective, it is not a laughing matter. After 9/11, Congress mandated tough new federal standards for driver's licenses called Real ID. States are supposed to implement them in little more than a year.

Every one of the 245 million license holders in the United States will have to reapply in person with documents that prove they are citizens or legal residents. The states predict it will swamp motor vehicle offices, creating long waits. Currently, each state issues licenses following their own security standards and with their own features.

KAREN JOHNSON, ARIZONA STATE SENATE: They have no business in our state's business. And that's what they're doing.

MESERVE: Arizona state senator Karen Johnson is sponsoring legislation saying her state will not comply. She says Real ID would invade privacy by creating a large national database of driver information.

JOHNSON: I mean, Homeland Security is the one that's going to be running this database? Give me a break.

MESERVE: Arizona is one of 24 states that has passed or proposed legislation opposing Real ID. The big complaint, the cost -- an estimated $11 billion over five years. The biggest expense is likely to be a requirement that states verify the authenticity of identity documents used to get a license.

DAVID QUAM, NATIONAL GOVERNORS ASSOCIATION: It's verification that not even the federal government can complete for its own employees.

MESERVE: Rody Marshall just got his license renewed in Phoenix in 20 minutes. If Real ID lengthens his wait, it's fine with him.

RODY MARSHALL, PHOENIX RESIDENT: I don't think everybody should just automatically get a driver's license. If it takes -- if it takes a day of your time, that's what it takes.

MESERVE: Homeland Security is taking an even harder line.

MICHAEL CHERTOFF, HOMELAND SECURITY SECRETARY: If we don't get it done now, someone is going to be sitting around in three or four years explaining to the next 9/11 Commission why we didn't do it.

MESERVE: Because the next person who tries to get a driver's license may want to do harm to the country, not just get a laugh.

Jeanne Meserve, CNN, Phoenix.

(END VIDEOTAPE)

MESERVE: As you mentioned, Kitty, the Department of Homeland security is expected to issue long-awaited regulations perhaps this week that will lay out the specifics of what states have to do to comply with Real ID. Some are guessing that will fuel the uproar rather than dampen it -- Kitty.

PILGRIM: Jeanne, what are the consequences to the states of not complying with this law?

MESERVE: Well, what the law says, if you do not comply, then your licenses can't be used as federal IDs. That means you can't use them to get into federal buildings, you can't use them to board airplanes. So consequence for the citizens.

PILGRIM: Yes. It seems like it.

Thanks very much.

Jeanne Meserve.
Back to top
indago
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 4:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Lisa Sylvester reported 9 February 2007:
Quote:
SYLVESTER: What they say -- what opponents say is what they are afraid is they don't want to see a national ID. In fact, Sensenbrenner is against a national ID as well, and his opponents say -- believe that this program is essentially one step away, that it would create a national database -- it would not create a national database. But they are concerned that it would, and that would essentially -- it would open up the door, if you -- so to speak, and would allow people access to this information, essentially keeping and tracking and monitoring Americans in this country.


Congressman James Sensenbrenner noted 7 February 2007:
Quote:
REP. JAMES SENSENBRENNER, (R) WISCONSIN: Well, they say it's a national driver's license and it's not. The Real ID Act, Lou, actually prevents a national ID card, because if we didn't use state driver's licenses to prove our identity, then there would be pressure on the federal government to have all of us carry a national ID, just like they do in continental Europe. That would be a bad move. And I've been strongly opposed to having a national ID card for a whole number of reasons.


Senator Charles Schumer noted 31 January 2007:
Quote:
SEN. CHUCK SCHUMER (D), NEW YORK: We propose every American, citizen, legal immigrant gets a non-forgeable employment card, a national employment card. It has a little chit in there that you can't forge that matches the retina of your eye. Every employer -- every employer would have to swipe the card through a little machine like a credit card machine, when someone applied for a job who would have their picture on it, of course.


Reported 26 January 26 2007:
Quote:
ROSEMARY JENKS, NUMBERSUSA: There really is no opt out with federal law. If they decide not to comply, then the result is that the people who get driver's licenses from that state will not be permitted to use their licenses for certain purposes like getting on an airplane.

PILGRIM: The new rules would say, unless a person had a driver's license issued with the new standard, a person could not board a plane, enter a federal building or enter a nuclear facility.


If this isn't a national ID card, I don't know what would be. Granted, we do need a secure system in this country to weed out those who do not belong here, but the federal government has no business entering the driver license field. Years ago, driving an automobile on the highways was considered -- and recognized by legal authorities -- to be a right, and that those who operated a motor vehicle on the roadways for profit had to be licensed by the State for this purpose. Gradually, the natural person and the artificial person were melded together into the law, and now the State won't recognize that there is a distinct difference between the two. The federal government has seized upon this abortion, and acted upon it to the detriment of the inhabitants of the States, and it has come to this.

Quote:
The new rules would say, unless a person had a driver's license issued with the new standard, a person could not board a plane


I really don't believe that a person boarding a plane has any intention of driving the plane, or even driving a car around in the plane. So, what would a driver license have to do with whether or not a person can ride in a plane?
Back to top
dissenters
Site Admin


Joined: 03 Dec 2003
Posts: 79

PostPosted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 7:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

If I have a drivers license I dont need a plane the way I drive.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Huntington West Virginia News Messge Boards Forum Index ->Huntington WV News Discussion All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
 


Powered by West Virginia Website Hosting © 2008 Sheck Technologies